Dialog 23: The Rainbow
- the Institute
- 11 minutes ago
- 4 min read
What's with the rainbow after the flood? Did the principles of light change? Was there a filter that fell?
This is a fascinating question that touches on physics, biblical interpretation, and how we understand ancient texts within your framework. Let me explore several angles:
The Physics Problem
From a scientific standpoint, rainbows are produced when sunlight refracts through water droplets at specific angles (approximately 42° for the primary bow). The physics required:
White light containing the full visible spectrum
Water droplets suspended in atmosphere
Observer positioned correctly relative to sun and rain
These physical conditions haven't changed. The wavelengths of light, refractive indices of water, and geometric relationships are constants governed by electromagnetic principles and the structure of water molecules.
Interpretive Possibilities Within Your Framework
1. First Recognition, Not First Occurrence
The rainbow existed before the flood—physics guarantees this. What changed was human recognition of its significance.
In your framework, where biblical language describes observations using available concepts, the "sign of the covenant" represents humanity's newfound capacity to read meaning in natural phenomena. Post-flood consciousness recognizes: "This recurring pattern in nature can serve as reminder of fundamental reality's reliable character."
The covenant isn't God changing natural law—it's humans learning to interpret persistent patterns as evidence of reality's trustworthiness.
2. Atmospheric Conditions Theory
Some literal interpreters suggest pre-flood Earth had a "vapor canopy" that prevented rainbows (the "waters above" in Genesis 1:7). This canopy supposedly:
Filtered certain light wavelengths
Created greenhouse conditions
Collapsed during the flood
Scientific problems:
No geological evidence for such a canopy
Physics makes this implausible (that much water vapor would create unbearable atmospheric pressure and heat)
We find evidence of rain, weather patterns, and erosion throughout Earth's geological history
Your framework's response: This is humans retroactively explaining why the text says "I have set my rainbow"—trying to force literal consistency rather than recognizing the text's phenomenological/theological purpose.
3. The Observation-Symbolism Reading
Consider the narrative context:
Flood represents catastrophic collapse (perhaps civilizational, not global)
Reset follows destructive recursion reaching breaking point
Rainbow appears as flood ends—literally, as storms clear
What Genesis may be recording: After devastating collapse, survivors observe natural phenomenon (rainbow) following storm and assign it theological meaning—this becomes their symbol of hope that reality's patterns remain reliable despite catastrophe.
The text isn't claiming rainbows never existed before. It's saying: "We now understand this natural occurrence as sign of reality's stable character. When we see rainbow, we remember: the patterns hold."
4. Anthropomorphic Covenant Language
In your framework, "God sets rainbow as sign" translates to:
Standard theistic reading: Supernatural person institutes new natural phenomenon or assigns meaning to existing one
Energy framework reading: Humans recognize that natural patterns themselves communicate reality's character. The rainbow—requiring specific conditions, following predictable physics, appearing after storms—becomes educational device about:
Order emerging from chaos (spectrum from white light)
Reliability (same physics every time)
Beauty in natural processes
Hope following destruction
"I will remember my covenant" = reality's patterns don't change. The rainbow serves as reminder to humans that fundamental laws persist—energy will continue transforming according to consistent principles.
The "Vapor Canopy" Problem
You asked specifically about a filter falling. This interpretation attempts literal harmonization:
Pre-flood: canopy blocks certain wavelengths, no rainbows
Flood: canopy collapses, becomes flood waters
Post-flood: normal atmosphere, rainbows now possible
Why your framework rejects this:
No physical evidence: Geological record shows continuous rain, erosion, water cycles throughout Earth's history
Physics violations: Amount of water vapor needed would make Earth uninhabitable via pressure/temperature
Misses the point: This interpretation tries to "save" literal reading at cost of engaging what the text actually teaches about covenant, hope, natural signs
Better reading available: Understanding rainbow as existing natural phenomenon now recognized as meaningful symbol preserves the text's wisdom without requiring impossible physics
What Genesis 9 Teaches in Your Framework
The text's actual insight (translated from supernatural to natural language):
"After catastrophic collapse, humans observed stable natural patterns resuming—including rainbows appearing after storms. This became their symbol: reality's fundamental character remains reliable. Even through destructive events, energy continues transforming according to consistent laws. The same principles that produced the rainbow will continue operating. We can trust these patterns."
The covenant: Not a supernatural being making a promise, but humanity recognizing and trusting in reality's conserved, reliable nature.
"Never again will I destroy the earth": Not divine promise to refrain from supernatural intervention, but recognition that reality's fundamental patterns enable life when aligned with properly. The "flood" (destructive collapse) won't recur if humans maintain alignment—the text is describing natural consequences, not arbitrary divine mood.
The Deeper Pattern: Signs in Nature
Your framework emphasizes: "The heavens declare..." (Psalm 19), "Ask the animals and they will teach you" (Job 12:7), "What is seen was not made out of what was visible" (Hebrews 11:3).
Biblical wisdom: Nature itself communicates reality's character to those who observe carefully.
The rainbow-covenant narrative exemplifies this: A natural phenomenon (rainbow) becomes pedagogical tool teaching fundamental principles:
Order exists within chaos
Patterns persist reliably
Beauty emerges from natural processes
Hope is grounded in reality's stable character
No physics change required. What changed was human capacity to read meaning in natural patterns—to see the invisible (reliable physical laws) made visible (through consistent phenomena like rainbows).
Your Framework's Answer
Did the principles of light change? No. Electromagnetic radiation behaves according to constant physical laws.
Was there a filter? No credible physical evidence suggests atmospheric conditions preventing rainbows pre-flood.
What happened? Humans experienced catastrophic event (possibly civilizational collapse rather than global flood), survived, and assigned theological meaning to natural phenomenon (rainbow) as symbol of reality's reliable character. The text records this meaning-making, not a change in physics.
The wisdom preserved: Reality can be trusted. Natural patterns persist. After destruction, the same laws that govern light, water, and atmosphere continue operating. This is grounds for hope—not because a supernatural being promises intervention, but because energy's fundamental character doesn't change.
The rainbow always existed. What emerged post-flood was human capacity to read it as sign—evidence that reality's patterns are trustworthy foundations for rebuilding.
Does this align with your framework's approach, or are there aspects you'd like to explore further?
Comments