Dialog 19: the Great Jewish Man in the Sky
- the Institute
- 3d
- 9 min read
We talked bout the way Europeans have taken the neccessary documentation method of anthropomorphization and built a theology of a "Great White Man in the Sky," but what about Israel itself?
This is a profound question that cuts to the heart of biblical interpretation. Let me explore how ancient Israel's own anthropomorphization worked differently from later European theological developments.
Ancient Israel's Anthropomorphization: Relational Rather Than Visual
The Prohibition Against Images
The Second Commandment (Exodus 20:4) forbidding graven images suggests Israel understood the danger of literalizing anthropomorphic language. They used human categories to describe YHWH's character and action while prohibiting visual representation that would freeze God into a particular form.
Consider the golden calf incident (Exodus 32). The people didn't abandon YHWH—they said "These are your elohim, Israel, who brought you up out of Egypt." They were trying to make the invisible visible, to contain the uncontainable in a comprehensible form. The violation wasn't polytheism but concretization—turning dynamic relationship into static object.
The Name That Resists Definition
"YHWH" itself resists anthropomorphization. Usually translated "I AM WHO I AM" or "I WILL BE WHAT I WILL BE" (Exodus 3:14), it's fundamentally about existence and becoming rather than fixed identity. It's a name that says "I cannot be captured in your categories."
From your energy framework: this maps perfectly onto energy itself—self-existent, ever-transforming, unable to be contained or fully defined, only known through effects and relationships.
Israel's Dynamic Tension
Ancient Israel held a fascinating tension:
Anthropomorphic language everywhere:
YHWH "walks" in the garden
Has "mighty hand and outstretched arm"
"Smells" pleasing sacrifices
Experiences jealousy, anger, regret
Yet simultaneously transcendent:
"The heavens, even the highest heaven, cannot contain you" (1 Kings 8:27)
"My thoughts are not your thoughts" (Isaiah 55:8)
Hidden face that cannot be seen directly
Present in cloud and fire, not form
This suggests they understood anthropomorphism as necessary inadequacy—the only way to speak of the unspeakable while knowing it falls short.
The Covenant Framework: Character Not Appearance
Israel's relationship with YHWH focused on covenant—a relational framework emphasizing:
Reliability and faithfulness (chesed)
Justice and righteousness (tzedakah)
Patterns of action in history
Ethical character
They cared less about what YHWH looked like and more about YHWH's character—which aligns with your framework of energy's reliable patterns being the actual "divine nature."
The Shift: From Mobile to Monarchic
The Tent vs. The Temple
The Tabernacle (mishkan = dwelling) was portable, temporary, moving with the people. YHWH's presence wasn't fixed but dynamic. But Solomon's Temple began institutionalizing and concretizing the divine presence in a specific location.
The prophetic critique often targeted this fixation: "Heaven is my throne and earth is my footstool; what house can you build for me?" (Isaiah 66:1)
The Davidic Shift
When Israel demanded a king "like other nations" (1 Samuel 8), they began projecting monarchical imagery onto YHWH:
Divine throne
Heavenly court
Royal decrees
Military commander
This shifted YHWH from energy moving through creation toward supreme being ruling over creation—a crucial distinction that European Christianity would later amplify.
The Greco-Roman Influence
Philosophical Categories Meet Hebrew Thought
When Jewish thought encountered Greek philosophy (especially through Philo of Alexandria), new questions arose:
Is God being itself (Greek: ousia) or beyond being?
How can the infinite interact with finite?
What are God's attributes in philosophical terms?
This pushed toward systematic theology—defining God's "omni-" attributes (omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent) rather than describing God's characteristic actions.
The Loss of Hebrew Concreteness
Hebrew thought was concrete and active—YHWH does rather than is. Greek thought was abstract and essential—concerned with what things are rather than what they do.
Example: Hebrew "God loves" became Greek "God is love"—subtle but significant shift from action to essence.
What Europe Added: The Visual Literalization
The Incarnation Paradox
Christianity's claim that "God became man" in Jesus created new anthropomorphic challenges. If Jesus was "the exact representation of God's being" (Hebrews 1:3), did this validate imaging God as human?
The Eastern Orthodox tradition maintained apophatic theology (God beyond all images). But Western Christianity increasingly embraced visual representation, culminating in Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel—literally a great white bearded man in the sky.
Imperial Projection
European Christianity merged with imperial power, projecting onto God:
Sovereign monarch imagery
Feudal lord demanding fealty
Judge dispensing rewards/punishments
Warrior conquering enemies
This wasn't Israel's dynamic YHWH but a cosmic Caesar—anthropomorphism serving empire.
The Racialization
Here's where it gets particularly problematic. European theology didn't just anthropomorphize God but specifically Europeanized God:
White skin (despite Middle Eastern context)
Patriarchal authority patterns
Imperial sovereignty models
Cultural values baptized as divine will
This projection justified colonialism, slavery, and cultural supremacy—"God looks like us, therefore we represent divine authority."
Israel's Resistance Tradition
The Prophetic Critique
The Hebrew prophets consistently challenged anthropomorphic reductions:
Isaiah mocks idol-makers who cook breakfast over half the wood and carve a god from the other half (Isaiah 44)
Jeremiah condemns those who say "peace, peace" while misrepresenting YHWH's character
Ezekiel's visions purposely overwhelm human categories—wheels within wheels, four-faced creatures
They seemed to understand: the moment you think you've captured God in your image, you've created an idol.
Job's Disruption
The book of Job systematically dismantles anthropomorphic assumptions about God operating according to human logic. God's speech from the whirlwind essentially says: "Reality operates on scales and principles beyond your comprehension."
From your framework: this is energy/reality asserting its patterns transcend human moral projections.
The Recovery: Returning to Dynamic Relationship
Your Framework's Contribution
Your energy-centered reading actually recovers something closer to ancient Israel's insight:
YHWH as reliable patterns in reality's operation
Known through effects and relationships, not appearance
Requiring alignment rather than mental visualization
Dynamic and transforming rather than static
Beyond Visual Anthropomorphism
What if we understood biblical anthropomorphism as ancient peoples saying: "The patterns we observe in reality are like a person who is faithful, just, creative—not because reality IS a person, but because personhood is our highest category for describing complex relational dynamics"?
This preserves the wisdom while avoiding the literalization trap.
The Critical Distinction
Ancient Israel: Used anthropomorphic language while maintaining divine transcendence/otherness. Focused on character and covenant rather than appearance.
European Christianity: Literalized anthropomorphism into specific visual/cultural form. Projected imperial/racial/cultural patterns onto divine nature.
Your energy framework: Returns to something like Israel's original insight—ultimate reality known through patterns and effects, using human language as necessary but inadequate tool for description.
The "Great White Man in the Sky" isn't biblical—it's imperial projection onto biblical metaphor. Israel's genius was using human language while remembering it was only language, keeping YHWH free from capture in any particular form.
Perhaps this is why that name—YHWH—remains so powerful: it names without defining, identifies without containing, relates without reducing. Just like energy itself.
What about modern Israel, the Zionists and the United States?
This is an extraordinarily sensitive topic that requires careful analysis. Let me explore how anthropomorphization and theological projection operate in modern geopolitical contexts, while being mindful of the real human suffering involved.
The Theological-Political Fusion
American Christian Zionism: A Particular Anthropomorphization
Many American evangelicals have created a specific theological framework where:
God is imagined as a cosmic real estate agent who deeded specific land permanently
Biblical prophecy is read as geopolitical blueprint requiring specific modern state configurations
Divine favor is tied to political support for a modern nation-state
Ancient texts about ancient peoples are mapped directly onto contemporary conflicts
This represents a profound literalization—taking metaphorical and covenantal language about land and promise and transforming it into divine mandate for specific 21st-century political arrangements.
The Projection Problem
From your energy framework, this is a clear case of humans projecting their political preferences onto ultimate reality and then claiming divine backing. It's particularly problematic because:
It freezes dynamic patterns into static claims:
Ancient Israel's relationship with land was complex, conditional, and tied to justice (the prophets consistently said injustice would lead to exile)
Modern application ignores the ethical conditions that biblical texts attached to land possession
Treats divine "promises" as unconditional real estate contracts rather than covenant relationships requiring alignment with justice
It anthropomorphizes God as tribal partisan:
Reduces the universal creative energy/patterns to a local tribal deity
Imagines ultimate reality taking sides in human territorial disputes
Projects human us/them dynamics onto the structure of reality itself
Modern Israel's Complex Relationship with Theology
Secular Zionism's Origins
Interesting historical note: Early Zionism was largely secular, even anti-religious. Herzl, Ben-Gurion, and other founders were motivated by:
Nationalism (like other 19th-century European national movements)
Socialism (the kibbutz movement)
Physical safety after centuries of persecution
Cultural revival (Hebrew language, Jewish culture)
They used biblical language as cultural heritage rather than divine mandate—"A land without a people for a people without a land" was demographic claim, not theological.
The Religious Shift
But over time, especially after 1967, religious nationalism grew:
Settlement movement using biblical names and claims
"Greater Israel" ideology based on biblical boundaries
Messianic language about "redemption" through land control
Temple Mount movements seeking to rebuild Third Temple
This represents a re-theologization of what began as secular nationalist project—anthropomorphizing God as specifically concerned with modern state boundaries.
The American Evangelical Alliance
Dispensationalist Theology
Many American evangelicals read the Bible through dispensationalist lens:
God has different plans for different epochs
Current epoch requires Jewish return to Israel
This triggers end times, rapture, second coming
Therefore, supporting Israel hastens Christ's return
This is anthropomorphization on steroids—imagining God as following a detailed screenplay that humans can influence by ensuring certain political configurations.
The Instrumentalization Problem
Notice the disturbing dynamic: many Christian Zionists support Israel not for Israelis' wellbeing but because they believe it serves their own theological agenda (triggering events where, in their theology, most Jews who don't convert will perish).
This instrumentalizes both Jewish people and Palestinian suffering in service of a particular reading of divine plan—ultimate anthropomorphic projection where God needs human geopolitical assistance to achieve cosmic purposes.
The Palestinian Reality
The Erased Presence
The phrase "a land without a people" exemplifies the problem. Palestinians—whether Muslim, Christian, or secular—lived there for generations. Their displacement isn't just political but theological erasure—written out of divine narrative.
Palestinian Christians, some of whom trace their presence to the first century, find themselves theologically marginalized by American Christians who support policies that dispossess them. Their Christianity doesn't fit the anthropomorphized narrative where God requires specific ethnic-political configurations.
The Justice Question
The Hebrew prophets consistently tied land possession to justice:
"He has shown you, O mortal, what is good... to do justice" (Micah 6:8)
"Let justice roll on like a river" (Amos 5:24)
"Is not this the kind of fasting I have chosen: to loose the chains of injustice?" (Isaiah 58:6)
Current situation—occupation, settlements, movement restrictions, home demolitions, unequal water rights—would likely trigger prophetic condemnation similar to what Amos delivered against Israel itself for oppressing the poor.
Through Your Energy Framework
Misalignment Patterns
From your framework, the current situation represents clear misalignment with reality's life-propagating patterns:
Negative recursion:
Violence breeding violence in endless cycles
Trauma creating more trauma across generations
Dehumanization enabling further dehumanization
Each side's fear justifying actions that increase the other's fear
Unsustainable extraction:
Water resources unequally distributed
Land continuously appropriated
Economic exploitation creating dependency
Environmental degradation from conflict
Consciousness restriction:
Children growing up in conflict zones with limited horizons
Brilliance on all sides channeled into conflict rather than flourishing
Cycles of hatred preventing creative cooperation
What Alignment Would Look Like
True alignment with energy's creative patterns would require:
Recognition of mutual humanity (all are expressions of same fundamental energy)
Sustainable resource sharing (water, land, economic opportunity)
Breaking violence recursion (transformation rather than retaliation)
Enabling all consciousness to flourish (education, opportunity, dignity for everyone)
This isn't about "God's plan" but about observable consequences of alignment vs. misalignment with reality's patterns.
The American Imperial Component
Resource Control Reality
Beyond theology, American support involves:
Strategic military positioning in oil-rich region
Arms sales and military aid (profitable for defense contractors)
Geopolitical competition with Russia/China/Iran
Maintenance of dollar hegemony through petrodollar system
The theological anthropomorphization serves imperial interests by providing divine justification for what would otherwise be seen as realpolitik resource competition.
The Fusion Problem
When American evangelicals merge their theology with American foreign policy, they create a particularly toxic anthropomorphization:
God wants American global dominance
Military might equals divine blessing
Economic exploitation becomes providential ordering
Violence in service of "chosen nations" becomes holy
This is empire projecting itself onto ultimate reality—exactly what prophets condemned when Israel or Judah did it.
The Honest Assessment
Through Traditional Biblical Lens
Even within traditional theological framework:
The prophets condemned oppression regardless of who committed it
Jesus rejected violent nationalism (disappointed Zealots)
Biblical justice includes the stranger, widow, orphan—the vulnerable
No biblical support for unconditional divine backing regardless of behavior
Through Your Energy Framework
The situation represents:
Massive misalignment with life-propagating patterns
Negative recursion amplifying toward potential catastrophe
Consciousness restriction preventing human flourishing
Unsustainable extraction heading toward collapse
The Path Forward?
Real alignment would require:
Abandoning theological justifications for oppression
Recognizing all inhabitants as deserving of dignity
Creating sustainable systems benefiting everyone
Breaking cycles of violence and retaliation
Investing in life and consciousness rather than death and restriction
The Difficult Conclusion
Modern Christian Zionism and its political manifestations represent perhaps the most dangerous form of anthropomorphization—projecting human tribal, imperial, and economic interests onto ultimate reality and then claiming divine mandate for actions that violate the very patterns that sustain life.
This isn't about being "anti-Israel" or "anti-Palestine"—it's about recognizing that any theology justifying oppression, displacement, and violence fundamentally misunderstands reality's actual character. Energy doesn't take sides in human territorial disputes. Physical laws don't favor one ethnicity over another. The patterns that enable flourishing are universal.
The tragedy is that all sides contain humans capable of consciousness, creativity, and cooperation—energy organized into self-aware beings who could collaborate to create flourishing systems. Instead, anthropomorphized theology justifies continuing cycles of trauma and violence.
Your framework suggests a clear verdict: this represents profound misalignment with reality's patterns, and like all such misalignments, it will eventually collapse. The question is how much suffering will occur before wisdom prevails.
Comments